In a searing critique that has ignited debate across international forums, former Special Advisor to the Ukrainian Foreign Minister, Cormac Smith, has lambasted United Nations Secretary General Antonio Guterres for what he describes as a profound betrayal of global trust during his recent visit to Russia. In a candid interview, Smith articulated his deep concerns over Guterres’ actions, questioning the integrity and credibility of the UN leadership in the face of escalating global tensions.
“Antonio Guterres in Russia… well, yeah, why? What was it all about?” Smith began, setting the tone for a scathing examination of the UN’s recent diplomatic maneuvers. He criticized Guterres for what he perceives as a blatant disregard for the principles that underpin the international community’s rules-based order.
Smith, speaking exclusively to our reporters, recounted his observations of the BRICS summit, labeling it a mere display of power aimed at convincing the world that Russian President Vladimir Putin is not isolated. “This Summit was attended by 36 countries in total, including new BRICS members like the United Arab Emirates and Egypt,” he noted, highlighting the strategic alliances being formed to counter Western influence.
The former advisor did not mince words when addressing Guterres’ apparent shift in alliances. “This is the same Secretary General who refused an invitation to a Ukrainian peace conference held in Switzerland earlier this year, yet he seems very eager to shake hands and give warm embraces to some of the world’s worst autocrats and dictators,” Smith asserted. He underscored the contradiction between the UN’s foundational values and the actions of its highest representative.
Smith further emphasized the growing antagonism between Western democracies and authoritarian regimes, naming Russia, China, North Korea, and Iran as the “axis of evil.” “Putin and Xi, in particular, have made no secret of how much they detest our rules-based order,” he explained, accusing Guterres of siding with these nations against the very principles established in the aftermath of World War II.
The interview delved into the ramifications of Guterres’ actions on global stability. Smith lamented the erosion of trust in international institutions, stating, “I grew up thinking we had left such times behind after World War II, but here we are in 2024, closer to the brink of a third world war than at any other point in our lifetimes.”
Addressing the controversial decision by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to deny Guterres’ visit, Smith defended the move as a necessary stand against what he perceives as UN complicity in undermining Ukraine’s sovereignty. “Gutierres has clearly chosen his side, and that side is against the rules-based order and everything we stand for and aspire to,” Smith remarked, advocating for unwavering support of democratic values amidst rising autocratic threats.
The interview also touched upon the broader implications of the BRICS summit and its impact on international relations. Smith questioned the effectiveness of such alliances in fostering genuine cooperation, suggesting that they primarily serve to bolster the influence of authoritarian leaders. “Hezbollah is not isolated, that much is clear. It didn’t go too well if you ask me. But did Putin find what he wanted? And what was it he wanted, anyway?” Smith pondered, highlighting the uncertainties surrounding the summit’s outcomes.
As tensions mount globally, Smith’s insights offer a critical perspective on the challenges facing international diplomacy. His unwavering stance on defending democratic principles against encroaching authoritarianism underscores the urgent need for cohesive and principled leadership within global institutions.
For in-depth analysis and comprehensive coverage, sources include the exclusive interview with Cormac Smith, statements from the Ukrainian Foreign Ministry, insights from geopolitical analysts at major think tanks, and reports from international media outlets such as Al Jazeera and The New York Times.
